![aurelia http client example aurelia http client example](https://vuejsexamples.com/content/images/2017/09/VueTables-2s.gif)
- #Aurelia http client example upgrade
- #Aurelia http client example full
- #Aurelia http client example code
That’s not the case with Aurelia’s DI.Īurelia Services - such as components - are plain Typescript classes. Sometimes it can be difficult to use something universal in a specific framework or library, maybe you need additional decorators (therefore additional unnecessary layers) or sometimes this is even nearly impossible because of the incompatible principles. Injecting dependenciesĪs I mentioned, we will use dependencies from our other library called sn-client-js. There are a lot of more complex possibilities however, like dynamic composition, value converters and computed properties. If you have a basic knowledge about HTML and Typescript you only have to learn how data binding works to create basic components.
![aurelia http client example aurelia http client example](https://pm1.narvii.com/7867/34f439b331d2960dd4b6686ca3737847a7b2433ar1-1400-1400v2_hq.jpg)
![aurelia http client example aurelia http client example](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TXlU-bHufMI/maxresdefault.jpg)
One of the cool things about Aurelia components is that you don’t need to dive deep in the framework.
#Aurelia http client example code
If you take a look at the example from the Aurelia hub you can notice that there is only a little piece of framework-specific code in the template and nothing (!) in the view-model. View templates are written in a standard-based HTML extended with a very simple binding language and the view-model can be written in ES2015 or Typescript. The view is separated from the view-model. In the first round, we have to develop these controls as Aurelia components.Īurelia has a clear concept of how a component should look like.
#Aurelia http client example full
Field controls represent a specific field type (let’s say a simple short text) while view controls represent a content’s full view for a specific action (for example an Edit view of a user) and is built from FieldControl components based on the generated schema from sn-client-js. We have two major types of controls: Field controls and View controls. View- and Field Controls - The next layer of our building blocks They will contain Aurelia / React specific components and will use the core functionality from sn-client-js. We have just started to develop our component packages that depend on templating and data binding, that’s where and why we have to create the two new packages - sn-controls-aurelia and sn-controls-react. Some features - like templating, data binding or routing - are implemented in each and every framework and they are based on different concepts. They work well in the core of our front-end library called sn-client-js.
![aurelia http client example aurelia http client example](https://i.stack.imgur.com/NcPpm.png)
We have quite so much sensenet ECM specific client side features that can be made framework independent like user session management, content operations, querying. I will explain why we’ve chosen Aurelia besides React. At this point we’ve decided to build on two of them for SPA development. But when it comes to build our new UI components we really had to choose between the modern libraries and frameworks. Our concept with sensenet ECM 7+ is to support a wide range of front-end developers as far as possible with our sn-client-js package that can be integrated into almost every NPM development pipeline. "aurelia-templating-resources": "1.13.It’s a quite challengeing task to choose a front-end toolset nowadays, especially for a development platform. This is the aurelia section of my package.json:
#Aurelia http client example upgrade
I am wondering if I need to upgrade other dependencies along with the aurelia-templating-resources upgrade. I am trying to upgrade aurelia-templating-resources from 1.6.0 -> 1.13.1 to get the fix for the race condition when composing a UI (PR: aurelia/templating-resources#345) - it is throwing an exception when it calls configure.globalResources (Invalid resource path [function Compose(element, container, compositionEngine, viewSlot, viewResources, taskQueue)). then(() => tRoot(PLATFORM.moduleName( "app"))) feature(PLATFORM.moduleName('resources/index')) Ī(bug ? "debug" : "warn") Ī(PLATFORM.moduleName( "aurelia-testing")) Ĭonst registry = (CustomElementRegistry) globalResources( "resources/elements/message-parts") Here is my main.js file: import * as environment from "./config/environment.json" Where are the "You will find the compiled code in the dist folder, available in module formats: UMD, AMD, CommonJS and ES6."? How do I distribute the exported web components to other framework? After running "npm run build", the dist folder just contains a bunch of app and vendors chunk js files. My project just has one component under src/resource/elements folder and I followed the instructions under. I am trying to use aurelia-web-components to export a simple custom element into web component in order to use by other framework.